How We Review Apps

AppVetter publishes two clearly distinguished content levels: in-depth editorial reviews and store-catalogue entries. Both use the same page layout so facts and download sources stay easy to find, but they do not make the same claims.

In-depth editorial reviews

These pages combine app research with a dedicated privacy section, concrete advantages and disadvantages, a written verdict, and update advice. Where a claim cannot be independently verified, we describe it as the company's statement rather than settled fact.

Verified catalogue entries

Catalogue entries use public Google Play facts such as the package name, developer, category, rating, install band, screenshots, and developer-supplied description. They explicitly say that AppVetter has not completed a hands-on test. We do not turn a store description into a fabricated personal experience.

Privacy and data safety

Google Play's Data safety panel is supplied by the developer. For catalogue entries we direct readers to that live disclosure and avoid assigning an independent privacy grade. In-depth reviews may also consider privacy policies, permission behaviour, public reporting, and regulatory action.

Ratings context

Star ratings and install counts are Google Play's published figures, not AppVetter scores. They can change after a page is refreshed; the official store listing remains authoritative.

Independence

Developers do not pay for placement or control our conclusions. Every app page links to the official listing, advertising is visually separate from content, and advertising partners have no say in coverage.

When apps change

We refresh catalogue metadata from public listings and correct material changes reported by readers. Editorial reviews receive deeper updates when a business model, privacy practice, ownership, or core feature changes.